Author: Martin van Staden
Date: 20 December 2017
It is now well-accepted in South African constitutional jurisprudence that the Constitution’s guarantee of equality in section 9 is not merely concerned with ‘formal’ equality (equality at law), but endorses a notion of ‘substantive’ equality. Formal equality is, however, still the root of the provision, and it thus cannot be argued that substantive equality supersedes the former. The law must still apply equally on a non-racial, non-sexist basis.
Substantive equality means government must in practice venture to make people more equal in terms of material wealth. This has manifested in the form of employment equity, quotas, and general racial-preferencing. There is a lot of debate about whether this is desirable or even possible.
In the first case, is parity really what South Africans should aspire to – rather than aiming as high as they possibly can? In the second case, human nature and the laws of economics have shown repeatedly that with the divergences of culture, individual interests, capabilities, etc., complete equality is impossible. The only type of plausibly-achievable equality is equal protection of the law.
(Read the rest of the article at the Free Market Foundation…)
Martin van Staden
Latest posts by Martin van Staden (see all)
- Violations of the Rule of Law undermine the Political Party Funding Bill - 2018-06-13
- Marshall v SARS (2018) CC - 2018-05-14
- Substantive equality cannot override formal equality - 2017-12-20